This is the post I recollected from my very very early days of blogging (read year 2003) and was in response to one of the debates we had in our group of office colleagues.

I guess pretty much I said that time about 6 years ago looks rubbish to me now anyways .. however I guess there are still a few valid points :-)

So here is how I went on my old blog.

Technology for Business

Some Cons against "Technology for Experiment" ….

  • Industry is never driven by only "Technology". The needs of the business generates the need for "Technology". So, lets first identify the facts of business, so called " Business Verticals" and divide the tasks for those verticals rather than the "Technology Horizontals".
  • The industry is continuously changing, becoming more cautious about the spending and cost/benefit analysis for the organizations.
  • The time has gone when the companies use to spend lots n lots of dollars just to change the look n feel of some of their useless sites just for the sake of "New Technology Adoption".
  • The expectations of the business from the IT companies have grown up to very high standards because of very competitive market and clear division of the market on the basis of the "Business Verticals".
  • Technology is a "Short Living" thing. On an average a technology becomes old within first 3 months of its origin.
  • The real challenge lies in "Foresight" predicting the way the IT will go in next say 5-10 years and act accordingly.
  • Only "Technology" really lacks in attracting more business now a days. e.g. A "beverage" organization will think twice before implement an XML standard even if you have done some significant work for some "finance sector" client, but on the other hand if we stick to the vertical then its not a big deal to attract more and more clients, at least through something called "Domain Experience".
  • The market is globally getting very tough and only the "Survival of the Fittest" is the only thing that is fact.
  • Admit the fact that a company can not compete and win a project against another one who is working in a particular domain for say last 5 years. e.g. Company A is technically very very sound. Company B is comparatively not so much but company B is very strong in its (say) Finance domain and working for it since last 5-6 years. Both are bidding for a Finance client…… you are intelligent enough to guess who is the ultimate winner.
  • Finally if you feel we are not intelligent enough to judge the battle. Look for the giants like "SAP", "Microsoft", "IBM" are doing to their products. Every giant has a product for a business verticals and virtually admitting that the industry is getting split vertically.

Some Pros for the "Technology" ..

  • Technology keeps the industry live.
  • Despite of various things it is still a fact that over 100 companies are still alive only because someone like Microsoft or IBM are developing more technologies and relative products.
  • Technology keeps your knowledge grow at a fast pace (I have used a word Knowledge and that does not mean Business).
  • Finally Its really a fun learning new technologies…..

 

Might have been an interesting debate really. Do not recollect enough as to what made me write this but looking at this … must have been a fun !

Cheerio

In my last article on entrepreneurship I wrote about the lack of entrepreneurship and innovation in India and the root cause in the education system that was adopted over the years.

Today, on the coffee table, we had another quick debate on this and one more topic that came out was the way we Indians think ! One of my colleague referred to an interview given by Infosys Chief Mentor Mr Narayana Murthy,

Indians are really good thinkers .. but not very good doers !

By the way, the word Indian is used in the context of people “living and working” in India. This should rather not be used in the context of Indians living abroad and shining there !

Ok, coming back to the quote I wrote above, I said I could not have agreed more with Mr Murthy and I would stick to my statement here. The reason I think he is right is the fact that when I correlate it with how I (average Indian wannabe great) think and act on the massive amount of ideas I generate .. I really feel the same.

In last few months, I have been having few solid ideas in my mind and I really wanted to build some portals to drive the entrepreneurship within me.

Most notable ideas I had were to to do with Childcare in India and Educational portal across major engineering colleges.

The biggest problem I am having is availability of like minded fellow colleagues who are interested in entrepreneurship.  The job I am in currently does now allow me to have these kind of colleagues around and that have the same drive as me to do different things .. :-(

In case you are wondering what kind of job I do in IT, I am a support consultant and in my job, the only thing that has importance is problem solving and incident management skills .. nothing to do innovation & initiatives ..

Anyways, enough of my own problems and coming back to the original topic of why Indians do not make it into entrepreneurship. The root cause I wrote in my earlier post was about the education system which just enforces you to learn what is in the book and does not encourage innovation nor independent thinking. So effectively, does not encourage you to “DO” things differently. All you end up with is to “Do what is told”.

I do not completely dismiss the thinking & doing of Indian IT companies and the very fact that India has become a giant IT outsourcing destination as well as world’s back office shows you that we Indians “Do” things fantastically well “when” the path of how to do is already defined.

The lack of core product companies, innovation houses, VC funding in India shows and supports the argument given by Mr Murthy. May be Government needs to think differently here and encourage the entrepreneurship via supporting the start ups etc.

Anyways, as usual the final thinking I would leave on you guys.

Please do leave a comment on my blog if you agree / disagree with my comments.

Cheerio

Last month I wrote an article on the emerging technologies & their influence on the traditional telecom services provider here.

I have been doing some more reading on this front and one of the most interesting article (research paper) I came across was from IBM on “The changing face of Telecommunications”. There is a PDF file you can download and read during your leisure time to get to know more about their thinking.

The paper concentrates on the aspect of the growing influence of the non-traditional telecom service providers such as Skype and the ever growing size of the people using Social Networking sites such as Facebook, Myspace, Orkut etc to get in touch with each other.

top20englishlanguagesites

The white paper also shows the stats taken from Alexa about how the usage of social media & social networking sites have grown in last few years. The bi-year comparison clearly shows how the sites such as Facebook, Myspace & Orkut are growing in the user base.

The IBM research pretty much sums up what I expect to happen in the field of Internet & Telecommunications in coming years.

Unless the traditional Telco’s such as British Telecom, Vodafone, Telefonica etc., starts welcoming the changes and act accordingly to provide a open & free options for their users to interact between themselves, I guess the day is not far when companies like Skype will take them over and be the preferred telecom providers.

A good few years back (approx 7 now) I wrote an article on how I would perceive the world of telecommunication & information technology would go about convergence. Obviously then there were no free blogs available for me to put, so I hired a free web space on tripod and put the HTML pages there with my articles. Obviously I did not use the account for several years later, it appears now as ceased. So I did lose the information I hosted on the account ! 

Ok, now coming back to the topic of the discussions, I vaguely remember what I put in there but it was more in terms of what the telecom companies could do to make life easier for the consumer by converging the telecom offerings with web based portals. The points I (vaguely) remember now were as follows,

  • Providing the web based interface for managing your phone & phone contents. – Recent example being the Microsoft MyPhone & Nokia Ovi service. I predicted earlier that the time could come when the technology will break boundaries between the device & web. Although late, I appreciate it coming now.
  • Providing internet based client (aka Skype or Softphone) that you would use to call landlines / mobiles and will be charged directly to your mobile bill – I have not seen this happening as yet. Essentially what I wanted to say here was to have a PC based client that would allow call management including taking calls (while you are out of country, roaming and want to avoid incoming call charge to your phone). Imagine if your work location has changed from UK to India and you are using a Yahoo Messenger kind of software to act as a softphone in UK so all your calls to your mobile are diverted to your PC in India and you take it via internet.  Does not it feel easy and really cool ?
  • Single mailbox for managing your emails, phone calls, text messages, multimedia & contacts – How about consumers being given the option of managing all their emails, phone call log details, text messages & contacts at one place and having complete freedom of interoperability.  You could choose to read/ write your emails on your mobile as well receive / send text messages via web interface ! Don’t you think it would be great if this could be achieved? Even better if you could do it with multiple devices.  Apparently Microsoft’s Live Mesh allows similar thing, but I am unsure if it allows greater level of flexibility in managing the stuff.

There is potentially a big world out trying to put the convergence via unified messaging but there are hindrances in the way of achieving potential peak of success. Lack of universal language spoken by mobile computing & pc computing players is one of them. I hope Microsoft, who are pushing hard with their Windows phone concept will take a note of this and give us some nice good options of convergence.

But again, most of the above are dependent on the communication service provider too ! Guess players like Vodafone, Orange, O2 need to take a notice of the potential & partner with someone like Microsoft / Google or Apple to achieve the level of convergence that would help them grow as well as open a big door of convergence to the consumers.

Anyone listening there ???

Did you know this in IT… ?

On February 9, 2009, in Business thoughts, Tech thoughts, by Swapnil
0

I came across this Youtube video recently and I was stunned with the facts mentioned in there …

Worth having a look.

Tagged with: